What kept Remnants alive, hmm… Well, before I came along it was Login, who took money from basically anyone in exchange for corruption. Clan marks, level boosts, whatever you wanted. After I came along, it was actually all me. I paid for it until I was $25,000 down. Then the shop launched. I’m sorry if you find the challenges monotonous, but any rewards better than "good" cause players to farm and us having to ban everyone. Also, value matters. It must be hard not to have abs ingame. So sorry.
I have no idea what you mean with most of your text, if you disagree about it being corruption, then that’s your opinion. You make it sound like Login sold clan marks after I came along (with your entire talk about me not responding for 2 days which I don’t recall). That’s not the case. I know enough people who also purchased levels from him, I call that corruption. You call it whatever you want.
I do remember that things,if you don't recall it,fine,sorry for the bad manners ,i really answered that on hot,the thing is i'm tired of reading things like corruption,level mean nothing for us,wasnt a comp server,you can also think wathever you want, the bad quality,we did what we could with the little we knowed and mostly everyone with no resources more than our time,feels really bad man reading that type of things everytime that someone brings remnants to the conversation,
Psst hey lans.. dean is right, sure rem was amazing back then and I loved maintaining it but at some point it turned into stressful work for me. Dean was the one who had to pay for unnecessarily pricey servers for ddos protection purposes (web, patchserver and s4).
The difference between Remnants and Xero (outside content and philosophy) is that clanmarks/items/goodies aren't sold behind other staff' backs, which happened too often on Remnants. It mostly wasn't even for server-costs.
The difference between Remnants and Xero (outside content and philosophy) is that clanmarks/items/goodies aren't sold behind other staff' backs, which happened too often on Remnants. It mostly wasn't even for server-costs.
Hi cc,long time no seeing you,welp,i literally said that dean for sure have to work and paid so much to mantain this thing,in any moment i didn't negate that,in regards of that i only said that isnt fair to lock out for at least buying the vainilla set,but my complaint its more when someone says anything about remnants and if something was better on there,i only see things like corruption or ''mediocre content'' for answers,that's what i meant for listening to the ppl in my first message,
Yeah the toxicity against rem is not fully deserved, I do understand it from the pov of its last months cause I fully agree on hating *that* remnants there, and yeah we had mediocre content but that was enough for rem back then, its not wrong so ;3
1
that happened ye,the selling behind back things,its undeniable,but you can't attach everything to it when someone its telling you that ''something'' was better back then,because as i said,you could buy things that were also obtainable for ''free ways'',and surely it got stresfull to you for mantain and i'm sorry,but it has nothing to do for what i said
Texte Publication - Texte - Newsfeed - Xero
